Beginning Assault on Missional?
Back on January 17th in 9Marks on Missional, I took Jonathan Leeman, Director of Communications for 9Marks, to task on his post, “Is the God of the Missional Gospel Too Small?”
Since then there has been a number of others who have entered the fray including those listed below. Together they form a pretty good critic of Mr. Leeman’s scantily documented, poorly thought-out and generally uninformed article.
Leeman’s assault on the missional conversation should not be taken lightly, so I urge you to give each of these posts a read so you can become conversant with the arguments and rebuttals. Leeman may just be the opening shot of more to come.
- “A Growing Divide? 9 Marks and Missional”
- “Missing the Missional Mark”
- “You Might Not Be Missional…”
- “The Missional Slope, or Should Have Linked to Kinnon”
- “Losing the Plot”
Tags: 9Marks, Jonathan Leeman, Liberalism, Missional, Missional Gospel
![[del.icio.us]](http://blindbeggar.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://blindbeggar.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://blindbeggar.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://blindbeggar.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://blindbeggar.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)



January 29th, 2010 at 4:04 pm
[...] MacDonald claims Mercy = Missional and Vice Versa (and I largely agree), and Rick Meigs provides a nice running catalog of several good [...]
January 30th, 2010 at 8:54 am
Is it just me or is it coincidence that on the “about us” page all (bar one) of the “key writers” are photographed leaning to the right? ;-)
January 30th, 2010 at 8:59 am
LOL. I hadn’t noticed that Mark. Coincidence? One wonders.